Glider discoveries
What member of the possum family eats only eucalyptus leaves, has fluffy ears, a long furry tail and can fly?*
Answer at the bottom of the page
Glider discoveries
What member of the possum family eats only eucalyptus leaves, has fluffy ears, a long furry tail and can fly?*
Answer at the bottom of the page
The NSW Government has exhibited an Environmental Impact Statement to build massive transmission towers through Kosciuszko National Park. The proposed ‘overhead’ connection links the new Snowy 2.0 powerstation with the electrical grid.
The National Parks Association of NSW is demanding that the Snowy 2.0 connection should be by underground cables rather than on overhead lines. Underground cables have far lower environmental impacts, are less vulnerable to fires and storms, are recognised as international best practice for environmentally sensitive sites, and avoid setting a terrible precedent for future connections through our precious national parks.
This guide will assist everyone who cares about the future of Kosciuszko National Park to make a submission demanding an underground connection for Snowy 2.0
The EIS for the Snowy 2.0 Transmission Connection can be viewed at https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/major-projects/project/10591
We recommend using the Planning Department Major Projects online form to make your submission. You’ll need to create an account with the NSW Department of Planning to be allowed to make a submission.
If you have any problems please email your written submission to Sharniec@npansw.org.au before the closing date and we’ll ensure it is forwarded to the NSW Department of Planning
It is always best to make a submission in your own words. You can be as specific or as general as you like, and remember there is no need to be an expert to offer a comment. Issues you might like to address include:
Dr Peter Turner, NPA Mining Projects Science Officer
To the great relief of many, the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) has refused the proposed expansion of the Dendrobium coal mine, south west of Sydney. Approval would have continued the highly damaging mining introduced in 2013, from 2024 to 2048. The refusal constitutes a reality check for the mining company, and the Department of Planning. The Department had been the consent authority since a Commission of Inquiry approved the mine in 2001.
Some insights and history from a marine activist and a marine scientist
Gary Schoer, Secretary, Southern Sydney Branch NPA
Dr Ross Jeffree, National and International Project Officer, Southern Sydney Branch NPA
Sharnie O’Connell, Marine Campaigner, NPA
Southern Sydney Branch first became aware of the possible threats to Sydney’s underwater marine ecosystems when plans were announced for sand mining offshore from Royal National Park in 1990. Faced with looming shortages of building sand from the Kurnell sandhills, Boral proposed that available technology would allow these largely sandy habitats to be exploited, thus filling potential gaps in supply.
Read More “What has happened to the planned Sydney Marine Park?”
Ross McDonnell, NPA Treasurer and former NPWS Regional Manager
It is hard to imagine a current government purchasing most of an historic town, with live-in residents, and transferring it to the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS). The foresight of doing so in 1967 to protect heritage values and to add a new reserve to the historic site category was courageous and commendable.
Read More “Hill End Historic Site – Draft Plan of Management”
NPA Parks Management Committee
The following regional planning issues are included in this edition of the journal because they raise issues that have potential state-wide implications for NPA and the protected area network.
You must be logged in to post a comment.